You are under no obligation ______ to accept this offer. A. whatsoever B. eventually C. apart D. indeed

DM

Dương Minh

21 tháng 1 2019

Mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the word(s) CLOSEST in meaning to the underlined word(s) in each of the following questions.This special offer is exclusive to readers of this magazine. A. presentable B. rewarding C. attractive ...

Đọc tiếp

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

21 tháng 1 2019

Đáp án D

Exclusive: riêng biệt, duy nhất

Presentable: có thể bày ra trước công chúng được, tươm tất

Rewarding: đáng công, đáng đọc, đáng xem; có lợi

Attractive: thu hút, lôi cuốn; hấp dẫn

Limited: hạn chế, có hạn

=> từ gần nghĩa nhất là limited

Dịch câu: Ưu đãi đặc biệt này dành riêng cho độc giả của tạp chí này.

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

15 tháng 8 2018

Mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the word(s) CLOSES T in meaning to the underlined word (s) in each of the following questions.This special offer is exclusive to readers of this magazine. A. presentable B. rewarding C. attractive...

Đọc tiếp

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

15 tháng 8 2018

Đáp án D

Từ đồng nghĩa

A. Exclusive: riêng biệt, duy nhất.

B. Presentable: có thể bày ra trước công chúng được, tươm tất.

C. Rewarding: đáng công, đáng đọc, đáng xem; có lợi.

D. Attractive: thu hút, lôi cuốn; hấp dẫn.

Limited: hạn chế, có hạn.

=> từ gần nghĩa nhất là limited.

Tạm dịch: Ưu đãi đặc biệt này dành riêng cho độc giả của tạp chí này.

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

2 tháng 12 2017

Mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the sentence that is closest in meaning to each of the following questions.The truth is hurtful, but you have to accept it. A. Hurtful as is the truth, you have to accept it. B. Hurtful as it is, you have to accept the truth. C. Much as hurtful the truth is, you have to accept it. D. In spite of the truth is hurtful, you have to accept...

Đọc tiếp

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

2 tháng 12 2017

Đáp án B

Câu gốc: Sự thật thì rất đau lòng nhưng bạn cần chấp nhận nó

Sử dụng cấu trúc đảo ngữ để nhấn mạnh: Adj + as + S + V, S + V

A. Sai cấu trúc đảo ngữ để nhấn mạnh

B. Dù rất đau lòng nhưng bạn cần chấp nhận sự thật

C. Sai cấu trúc đảo ngữ để nhấn mạnh

D. Sai cấu trúc vì in spite of + noun phrase

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

8 tháng 4 2018

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their ancestors towards languages which promise education, success and the chance of a better life. While to many parents, this may appear a reasonable choice, giving their offspring the opportunity to achieve the sort of prosperity they see on television, the children themselves often lose touch with their roots. However, in many places the more reasonable option of bilingualism, where children learn to speak both a local and a national language, is being promoted. This gives hope that many endangered languages will survive, allowing people to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. It is generally accepted that national languages unite and help to create wealth while minority regional languages divide. Furthermore, governments have a duty to ensure that young people can fulfil their full potential, meaning that state education must provide them with the ability to speak and work in their national language and so equip them to participate responsibly in national affairs. People whose language competence does not extend beyond the use of a regional tongue have limited prospects. This means that while many people may feel a sentimental attachment to their local language, their government’s position should be one of benign neglect, allowing people to speak the language, but not acting to prevent its eventual disappearance.

Many PhD students studying minority languages lack the resources to develop their language skills, with the result that they have to rely on interpreters and translators to communicate with speakers of the language they are studying. This has a detrimental effect on the quality of their research. At the same time, they have to struggle against the frequently expressed opinion that minority languages serve no useful purpose and should be allowed to die a natural death. Such a view fails to take into account the fact that a unique body of knowledge and culture, built up over thousands of years, is contained in a language and that language extinction and species extinction are different facets of the same process. They are part of an impending global catastrophe which is beginning to look unavoidable.

(Adapted from Complete Advanced by Guy Brook – Hart and Simon Haines)

What does the word “this” in the first paragraph refer to?

A. the more reasonable option

B. the place where children can use bilingualism

C. the opportunity to achieve prosperity

D. the promotion of bilingualism

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

8 tháng 4 2018

Đáp án D

Từ “this” trong đoạn 1 đề cập đến điều gì?

A.lựa chọn hợp lý hơn

B.nơi mà trẻ em có thể sử dụng song ngữ

C.cơ hội giàu có

D.sự đẩy mạnh sử dụng song ngữ

Căn cứ thông tin đoạn 1:

However, in many places the more reasonable option of bilingualism, where children learn to speak both a local and a national language, is being promoted. This gives hope that many endangered languages will survive, allowing people to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

(Tuy nhiên, ở nhiều nơi, một lựa chọn hợp lý hơn là song ngữ, nơi mà trẻ em học nói cả ngôn ngữ địa phương lẫn ngôn ngữ quốc gia, đang được đẩy mạnh. Điều này mang lại hi vọng rằng nhiều ngôn ngữ đang có nguy cơ tuyệt chủng sẽ sống sót, cho phép mọi người kết nối truyền thống của địa phương với văn hóa thế giới rộng lớn hơn).

Như vậy, this (điều này) ở đây chỉ sự đẩy mạnh việc sử dụng song ngữ.

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

26 tháng 8 2017

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their ancestors towards languages which promise education, success and the chance of a better life. While to many parents, this may appear a reasonable choice, giving their offspring the opportunity to achieve the sort of prosperity they see on television, the children themselves often lose touch with their roots. However, in many places the more reasonable option of bilingualism, where children learn to speak both a local and a national language, is being promoted. This gives hope that many endangered languages will survive, allowing people to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. It is generally accepted that national languages unite and help to create wealth while minority regional languages divide. Furthermore, governments have a duty to ensure that young people can fulfil their full potential, meaning that state education must provide them with the ability to speak and work in their national language and so equip them to participate responsibly in national affairs. People whose language competence does not extend beyond the use of a regional tongue have limited prospects. This means that while many people may feel a sentimental attachment to their local language, their government’s position should be one of benign neglect, allowing people to speak the language, but not acting to prevent its eventual disappearance.

Many PhD students studying minority languages lack the resources to develop their language skills, with the result that they have to rely on interpreters and translators to communicate with speakers of the language they are studying. This has a detrimental effect on the quality of their research. At the same time, they have to struggle against the frequently expressed opinion that minority languages serve no useful purpose and should be allowed to die a natural death. Such a view fails to take into account the fact that a unique body of knowledge and culture, built up over thousands of years, is contained in a language and that language extinction and species extinction are different facets of the same process. They are part of an impending global catastrophe which is beginning to look unavoidable.

(Adapted from Complete Advanced by Guy Brook – Hart and Simon Haines)

According to the first paragraph, why do many parents consider the change towards national languages a reasonable choice?

A.Because not many people nowadays are familiar with the language of their ancestors.

B.Because children now can learn to speak both a local and a national language.

C.Because their children may have a chance to achieve education, success and better living condition.

D.Because their children may help to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

26 tháng 8 2017

Đáp án C

Theo đoạn văn thứ nhất, tại sao nhiều bố mẹ lại coi sự chuyển đổi sang sử dụng ngôn ngữ quốc gia là một lựa chọn hợp lý?

A.Bởi vì không nhiều người ngày nay còn quen thuộc với ngôn ngữ của tổ tiên họ.

B.Bởi vì trẻ em ngày nay có thể học nói cả ngôn ngữ địa phương lẫn ngôn ngữ quốc gia.

C.Bởi vì con cái họ sẽ có cơ hội được học tập, đạt được thành công và có điều kiện sống tốt hơn.

D.Bởi vì con cái họ có thể giúp kết nối văn hóa địa phương với văn hóa thế giới rộng lớn hơn.

Căn cứ thông tin đoạn 1:

Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their ancestors towards languages which promise education, success and the chance of a better life. While to many parents, this may appear a reasonable choice, giving their offspring the opportunity to achieve the sort of prosperity they see on television, the children themselves often lose touch with their roots.

(Ngày càng ít người nói các ngôn ngữ như Liki, Taushiro và Dumi vì con cái họ đã chuyển từ ngôn ngữ của tổ tiên sang sử dụng ngôn ngữ quốc gia, cái mà hứa hẹn cung cấp cho họ giáo dục, thành công và cơ hội có một cuộc sống tốt hơn. Trong khi với nhiều cha mẹ, điều này có thể là một lựa chọn hợp lý, giúp con cái họ có cơ hội đạt được các thành tựu mà họ thấy trên truyền hình, thì những đứa trẻ lại tự đánh mất cội nguồn).

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

7 tháng 11 2017

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their ancestors towards languages which promise education, success and the chance of a better life. While to many parents, this may appear a reasonable choice, giving their offspring the opportunity to achieve the sort of prosperity they see on television, the children themselves often lose touch with their roots. However, in many places the more reasonable option of bilingualism, where children learn to speak both a local and a national language, is being promoted. This gives hope that many endangered languages will survive, allowing people to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. It is generally accepted that national languages unite and help to create wealth while minority regional languages divide. Furthermore, governments have a duty to ensure that young people can fulfil their full potential, meaning that state education must provide them with the ability to speak and work in their national language and so equip them to participate responsibly in national affairs. People whose language competence does not extend beyond the use of a regional tongue have limited prospects. This means that while many people may feel a sentimental attachment to their local language, their government’s position should be one of benign neglect, allowing people to speak the language, but not acting to prevent its eventual disappearance.

Many PhD students studying minority languages lack the resources to develop their language skills, with the result that they have to rely on interpreters and translators to communicate with speakers of the language they are studying. This has a detrimental effect on the quality of their research. At the same time, they have to struggle against the frequently expressed opinion that minority languages serve no useful purpose and should be allowed to die a natural death. Such a view fails to take into account the fact that a unique body of knowledge and culture, built up over thousands of years, is contained in a language and that language extinction and species extinction are different facets of the same process. They are part of an impending global catastrophe which is beginning to look unavoidable.

(Adapted from Complete Advanced by Guy Brook – Hart and Simon Haines)

Which statement is NOT true according to the passage?

A.Local languages can’t unite and create as much wealth as national languages.

B.State education is obligatory to ensure young people to speak and work in their regional languages.

C.Lack of language skills causes a negative effect on the quality of PhD students’ research.

D.Each citizen has their right to decide whether they want to speak a minority language or not.

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

7 tháng 11 2017

Đáp án B

Phát biểu nào sau đây là không đúng theo đoạn văn?

A.Ngôn ngữ địa phương không thể thống nhất và tạo ra nhiều thịnh vượng như ngôn ngữ quốc gia.

B.Giáo dục nhà nước bắt buộc phải đảm bảo thế hệ trẻ có thể nói và làm việc bằng ngôn ngữ của địa phương họ.

C.Thiếu kĩ năng ngôn ngữ có thể gây ảnh hưởng tiêu cực đến chất lượng nghiên cứu của các nghiên cứu sinh.

D.Mỗi công dân đều có quyền quyết định liệu họ có muốn sử dụng ngôn ngữ thiểu số hay không.

Căn cứ vào các thông tin sau:

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. It is generally accepted that national languages unite and help to create wealth while minority regional languages divide. Furthermore, governments have a duty to ensure that young people can fulfil their full potential, meaning that state education must provide them with the ability to speak and work in their national language and so equip them to participate responsibly in national affairs. (Đoạn 2) (Trong khi các cá nhân được tự do chọn lựa liệu họ có muốn sử dụng ngôn ngữ thiểu số hay không, thì các chính phủ lại không bắt buộc phải cung cấp một nền giáo dục không có lợi về mặt kinh tế, đặc biệt là trong thời đại hạn chế về ngân sách. Người ta tin rằng các ngôn ngữ quốc gia hợp nhất và giúp tạo ra nhiều thịnh vượng trong khi các ngôn ngữ thiểu số địa phương lại chia rẽ. Hơn nữa, chính phủ có trách nhiệm phải bảo đảm rằng thế hệ trẻ có thể phát huy tất cả tiềm năng của họ, có nghĩa rằng giáo dục nhà nước phải cung cấp cho họ khả năng nói và làm việc bằng ngôn ngữ quốc gia và do đó trang bị cho họ để tham gia vào các vấn đề quốc gia một cách có trách nhiệm).

Many PhD students studying minority languages lack the resources to develop their language skills, with the result that they have to rely on interpreters and translators to communicate with speakers of the language they are studying. This has a detrimental effect on the quality of their research. (Đoạn 3) (Nhiều nghiên cứu sinh đang nghiên cứu các ngôn ngữ thiểu số bị thiếu hụt về tư liệu để phát triển các kĩ năng của họ, và kết quả là họ phải phụ thuộc vào các biên dịch và thông dịch để giao tiếp với những người nói ngôn ngữ mà họ đang học. Điều này gây tác động tiêu cực đến chất lượng các nghiên cứu của họ).

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

18 tháng 1 2019

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their ancestors towards languages which promise education, success and the chance of a better life. While to many parents, this may appear a reasonable choice, giving their offspring the opportunity to achieve the sort of prosperity they see on television, the children themselves often lose touch with their roots. However, in many places the more reasonable option of bilingualism, where children learn to speak both a local and a national language, is being promoted. This gives hope that many endangered languages will survive, allowing people to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. It is generally accepted that national languages unite and help to create wealth while minority regional languages divide. Furthermore, governments have a duty to ensure that young people can fulfil their full potential, meaning that state education must provide them with the ability to speak and work in their national language and so equip them to participate responsibly in national affairs. People whose language competence does not extend beyond the use of a regional tongue have limited prospects. This means that while many people may feel a sentimental attachment to their local language, their government’s position should be one of benign neglect, allowing people to speak the language, but not acting to prevent its eventual disappearance.

Many PhD students studying minority languages lack the resources to develop their language skills, with the result that they have to rely on interpreters and translators to communicate with speakers of the language they are studying. This has a detrimental effect on the quality of their research. At the same time, they have to struggle against the frequently expressed opinion that minority languages serve no useful purpose and should be allowed to die a natural death. Such a view fails to take into account the fact that a unique body of knowledge and culture, built up over thousands of years, is contained in a language and that language extinction and species extinction are different facets of the same process. They are part of an impending global catastrophe which is beginning to look unavoidable.

(Adapted from Complete Advanced by Guy Brook – Hart and Simon Haines)

The word “constraints” in the second language is closest in meaning to_____.

A. investments

B. restrictions

C. crises

D. depressions

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

18 tháng 1 2019

Đáp án B

Từ “constraints” trong đoạn 2 gần nghĩa nhất với từ______.

A.tiền đầu tư

B.sự hạn chế

C.khủng hoảng

D.sự suy thoái

Từ đồng nghĩa: constraint (sự hạn chế, sự thắt chặt) = restriction

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. (Trong khi các cá nhân được tự do chọn lựa liệu họ có muốn sử dụng ngôn ngữ thiểu số hay không, thì các chính phủ lại không bắt buộc phải cung cấp một nền giáo dục không có lợi về mặt kinh tế, đặc biệt là trong thời đại hạn chế về ngân sách).

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

9 tháng 1 2019

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their ancestors towards languages which promise education, success and the chance of a better life. While to many parents, this may appear a reasonable choice, giving their offspring the opportunity to achieve the sort of prosperity they see on television, the children themselves often lose touch with their roots. However, in many places the more reasonable option of bilingualism, where children learn to speak both a local and a national language, is being promoted. This gives hope that many endangered languages will survive, allowing people to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. It is generally accepted that national languages unite and help to create wealth while minority regional languages divide. Furthermore, governments have a duty to ensure that young people can fulfil their full potential, meaning that state education must provide them with the ability to speak and work in their national language and so equip them to participate responsibly in national affairs. People whose language competence does not extend beyond the use of a regional tongue have limited prospects. This means that while many people may feel a sentimental attachment to their local language, their government’s position should be one of benign neglect, allowing people to speak the language, but not acting to prevent its eventual disappearance.

Many PhD students studying minority languages lack the resources to develop their language skills, with the result that they have to rely on interpreters and translators to communicate with speakers of the language they are studying. This has a detrimental effect on the quality of their research. At the same time, they have to struggle against the frequently expressed opinion that minority languages serve no useful purpose and should be allowed to die a natural death. Such a view fails to take into account the fact that a unique body of knowledge and culture, built up over thousands of years, is contained in a language and that language extinction and species extinction are different facets of the same process. They are part of an impending global catastrophe which is beginning to look unavoidable.

(Adapted from Complete Advanced by Guy Brook – Hart and Simon Haines)

The word “facets” in the last paragraph could be best replaced by_____.

A. aspects

B. problems

C. procedures

D. products

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

9 tháng 1 2019

Đáp án A

Từ “facets” trong đoạn cuối có thể được thay thế bởi từ .

A.khía cạnh, mặt

B.vấn đề

C. tiến trình

D. sản phẩm

Từ đồng nghĩa: facet (mặt, khía cạnh) = aspect

Such a view fails to take into account the fact that a unique body of knowledge and culture, built up over thousands of years, is contained in a language and that language extinction and species extinction are different facets of the same process.

(Quan điểm này không thể tính đến sự thật rằng sự hợp nhất của kiến thức và văn hóa, được xây dựng qua hàng ngàn năm, được chứa đựng trong một ngôn ngữ và rằng sự tuyệt chủng của ngôn ngữ và sự tuyệt chủng của các loài là các khía cạnh khác nhau của cùng một quá trình).

Đúng(0)

DM

Dương Minh

12 tháng 2 2019

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their...

Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

In our connected globalized world, the languages which dominate communications and business, Mandarin, Hindi, English, Spanish and Russian amongst others, are placing small languages spoken in remote places under increasing pressure. Fewer and fewer people speak languages such as Liki, Taushiro and Dumi as their children shift away from the language of their ancestors towards languages which promise education, success and the chance of a better life. While to many parents, this may appear a reasonable choice, giving their offspring the opportunity to achieve the sort of prosperity they see on television, the children themselves often lose touch with their roots. However, in many places the more reasonable option of bilingualism, where children learn to speak both a local and a national language, is being promoted. This gives hope that many endangered languages will survive, allowing people to combine their links to local tradition with access to wider world culture.

While individuals are free to choose if they wish to speak a minority language, national governments should be under no obligation to provide education in an economically unproductive language, especially in times of budget constraints. It is generally accepted that national languages unite and help to create wealth while minority regional languages divide. Furthermore, governments have a duty to ensure that young people can fulfil their full potential, meaning that state education must provide them with the ability to speak and work in their national language and so equip them to participate responsibly in national affairs. People whose language competence does not extend beyond the use of a regional tongue have limited prospects. This means that while many people may feel a sentimental attachment to their local language, their government’s position should be one of benign neglect, allowing people to speak the language, but not acting to prevent its eventual disappearance.

Many PhD students studying minority languages lack the resources to develop their language skills, with the result that they have to rely on interpreters and translators to communicate with speakers of the language they are studying. This has a detrimental effect on the quality of their research. At the same time, they have to struggle against the frequently expressed opinion that minority languages serve no useful purpose and should be allowed to die a natural death. Such a view fails to take into account the fact that a unique body of knowledge and culture, built up over thousands of years, is contained in a language and that language extinction and species extinction are different facets of the same process. They are part of an impending global catastrophe which is beginning to look unavoidable.

(Adapted from Complete Advanced by Guy Brook – Hart and Simon Haines)

What can be inferred from the sentence “their government’s position should be one of benign neglect” in paragraph 2?

A.People who are not members of the government will be allowed to speak their local languages.

B.It’s better to allow these minority languages to die naturally by neglecting them.

C.The government does not appreciate the importance of minority languages.

D.The local people will be neglected if they use their ancestors’ languages.

#Mẫu giáo

1

NH

Nguyen Hoang Hai

12 tháng 2 2019

Đáp án B

Có thể suy ra điều gì từ câu “their government’s position should be one of benign neglect” trong đoạn 2?

A.Những người không phải là thành viên của chính phủ sẽ được phép nói ngôn ngữ của địa phương họ.

B.Tốt hơn là nên để các ngôn ngữ thiểu số này bị đào thải một cách tự nhiên bằng cách phớt lờ chúng.

C.Chính phủ không coi trọng tầm quan trọng của các ngôn ngữ thiểu số.

D.Người dân địa phương sẽ bị phớt lờ nếu họ sử dụng ngôn ngữ của tổ tiên họ.

Căn cứ vào thông tin đoạn 2:

This means that while many people may feel a sentimental attachment to their local language, their government’s position should be one of benign neglect, allowing people to speak the language, but not acting to prevent its eventual disappearance. (Điều này có nghĩa rằng trong khi nhiều người cảm thấy khá gắn kết với ngôn ngữ địa phương họ, thì thái độ của chính phủ nên là nhẹ nhàng phớt lờ, vẫn cho phép họ nói ngôn ngữ đó, nhưng lại không làm gì để bảo tồn nó khỏi sự biến mất dần dần).

Như vậy, thái độ nhẹ nhàng phớt lờ, không hề bảo tồn các ngôn ngữ thiểu số là cách để cho nó bị đào thải một cách tự nhiên.

Đúng(0)

Chúng tôi đề xuất

Tài nguyên

Ứng dụng mobile

Bảng xếp hạng

Các khóa học có thể bạn quan tâm

Yêu cầu VIP