K
Khách

Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.

22 tháng 1 2017

 Nghĩa câu đã cho: Mặc dù chúng tôi ấn tượng với những rạp chiếu phim mới, nhưng chúng tôi thấy nó khá đắt.

Cấu trúc nhấn mạnh : Adj + as + S + V, S + V : Adj as SV, SV: mặc dù.... đến thế nào nhưng...

Đáp án đúng là D. Chúng tôi đã rất ấn tượng bởi các rạp chiếu phim mới, nhưng thấy nó khá đắt.

30 tháng 11 2017

D

Kiến thức: Viết lại câu

Giải thích:

Tạm dịch: Dù chúng tôi ấn tượng bởi rạp chiếu phim mới, chúng tôi thấy nó khá đắt.

A. Chúng tôi không hề ấn tượng bởi rạp chiếu phim mới tí nào bởi vì nó trông khá tốn kém.

B. Chúng tôi không ấn tượng bởi về ngoài của rạp chiếu phim mới nhiều như giá của nó.

C. Rạp chiếu phim mới đắt hơn chúng tôi nghĩ.

D. Chúng tôi rất ấn tượng với rạp chiếu phim mới, nhưng thấy nó khá đắt.

Đáp án:D

28 tháng 10 2019

  Nghĩa câu đã cho: Mặc dù chúng tôi ấn tượng với những rạp chiếu phim mới, nhưng chúng tôi thấy nó khá đắt.

Cấu trúc nhấn mạnh : Adj + as + S + V, S + V : Adj as SV, SV: mặc dù.... đến thế nào nhưng...

Đáp án đúng là D. Chúng tôi đã rất ấn tượng bởi các rạp chiếu phim mới, nhưng thấy nó khá đắt.

16 tháng 12 2017

                                 Câu đề bài: Ấn tượng về bộ phim, nhưng chúng tôi cảm thấy nó khá là đắt.

 Đáp án C: Chúng tôi rất ấn tượng về bộ phim, nhưng cảm thấy nó khá là đắt.

Các đáp án còn lại:

A. Chúng tôi không ấn tượng bởi bộ phim, chúng tôi cảm thấy nó khá là đắt.

B. Chúng tôi không ấn tượng lắm về bộ phim bởi giá của nó.

D. Bộ phim đắt hơn mong đợi của chúng tôi.

16 tháng 7 2019

Đáp án C

Impressed as we were by the new cinema, we found it rather expensive.

Ấn tượng về bộ phim, nhưng chúng tôi cảm thấy nó khá là đắt

= We were very impressed by the new cinema, but we found it rather expensive.

Chúng tôi rất ấn tượng về bộ phim, nhưng cảm thấy nó khá là đắ

30 tháng 10 2018

Câu đã cho là câu có hai mệnh đề chỉ sự tương phản nhượng bộ với cấu trúc: Adj as + S + V, S+ V. Đáp án là A. Dùng “but” nối hai mệnh đề chỉ sự tương phản

25 tháng 8 2017

Đáp án C

Kiến thức: Từ vựng

Giải thích:

absent-minded (a): đãng trí                   big-headed (a): tự phụ

quick-witted (a): nhanh trí; thông minh       bad-tempered (a): dễ nổi nóng

Tạm dịch: Chúng tôi đã khá ấn tượng bởi những sinh viên nhanh trí đã đưa ra câu trả lời cho câu hỏi của chúng tôi gần như ngay lập tức.

4 tháng 8 2018

Đáp án C

Kiến thức về từ vựng

A. absent-minded (a): đãng trí

B. big-headed (a): tự phụ

C. quick-witted (a): nhanh trí; thông minh

D. bad-tempered (a): dễ nổi nong

Tạm dịch: Chúng tôi đã khá ấn tượng bởi những sinh viên nhanh trí đã đưa ra câu trả lời cho câu hỏi của chúng tôi gần như ngay lập tức.

Các cấu trúc khác cần lưu ý:

Be impressed by st: ấn tượng với cái gì

Come up with = work out: tìm ra, đưa ra, nảy ra ý tưởng

Immediately = on the spot: ngay lập tức

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D to indicate the correct answer of each question. Boots has reduced the price of "feminine" razors to bring them in line with men's. The chemist chain says it is just an isolated incident, but campaigners say it is part of a "pink tax" that discriminates against women. Who's right and what's the bigger story, ask Jessica McCallin and Claire Bates. Campaigners against what's been dubbed the "pink tax" - where retailers charge women more...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D to indicate the correct answer of each question.

Boots has reduced the price of "feminine" razors to bring them in line with men's. The chemist chain says it is just an isolated incident, but campaigners say it is part of a "pink tax" that discriminates against women. Who's right and what's the bigger story, ask Jessica McCallin and Claire Bates. Campaigners against what's been dubbed the "pink tax" - where retailers charge women more than men for similar products - are celebrating after Boots said it would change the price of some of its goods.

Stevie Wise, who launched the petition, was driven by a Times investigation which claimed that women and girls are charged, on average, 37% more for clothes, beauty products and toys. The New York Department of Consumer Affairs had compared the prices of 800 products with male and female versions and concluded that, after controlling for quality, women's versions were, on average, 7% more expensive than men's.

“This is a very exciting response,” says Wise. We are delighted with Boots' decision, but we now need to get them to look at all of their products, not just the ones highlighted in the petition. We hope this decision is just the first of many and we may broaden our campaign to focus on other retailers as well." Wise says that women have been getting in touch with examples of other price discrepancies from lots of companies and says there seems to be a particular problem with toys and clothes. Argos has been criticized for identical scooters that cost £5 more if they were pink rather than blue. Argos said it was an error that had already been rectified and that it would never indulge in differential pricing.

Among the examples sent to Wise was Boots selling identical child car seats that cost more in pink. Another retailer was selling children's balance bikes which cost more for a flowery print aimed at girls than a pirate print aimed at boys. But the latter example  already appears to have been tweaked on the retailer's website, albeit by applying a £10 discount to the flowery version.

When challenged over sexist pricing, both Levi's and Tesco argued that different versions of things could have different production costs even if appearing fairly similar. Prof Nancy Puccinelli says her research suggests that women are much more careful shoppers than men, better able to scrutinise adverts and pricing gimmicks. She wonders if women are perceiving more value in the more expensive products. “If products are separated into male and female sections far away from each other it's harder to scrutinise prices.” Such a situation could either be deliberate or accidental but the campaigners are not convinced.

There is an opportunity for some companies, argues Olchawski. “The finding shows the power of marketing in our lives, how it shapes our perception of what it means to be a man or a woman. Some companies could choose not to play into this, not to play into the stereotypes and rip women off, but launch products more in tune with moves toward gender equality.”

(Adapted from FELTS Academic Reading Test 6. Section 3)

 After comparing the prices of 800 products with male and female versions, the New York Department of Consumer Affairs __________.

 

 

A. did nothing 

B. drew a conclusion that versions for females seemed to be more expensive than for males 

C. supported for women's right 

D. continued to control for quality

1
11 tháng 9 2018

Đáp án B

Vụ Tiêu Dùng New York (cơ quan chịu trách nhiệm về các vấn đề tiều dùng) đã làm gì sau khi so sánh giá giữa 800 sản phẩm của nam và nữ?

A. Họ không làm gì cả.

B. Họ kết luận rằng các sản phẩm của phụ nữ có mức giá đắt hơn so với các sản phẩm của nam giới.

C. Họ ủng bộ quyền của phụ nữ.

D. Họ tiếp tục kiểm soát về mặt chất lượng.

Căn cứ vào thông tin đoạn 2:

“The New York Department of Consumer Affairs had compared the prices of 800 products with male and female versions and concluded that, after controlling for quality, women's versions were, on average, 7% more expensive than men's." (Vụ Tiêu Dùng New York đã so sánh giá giữa 800 sản phẩm của cả nam và nữ, và kết luận rằng, sau khi kiểm soát chất lượng, các sản phẩm của phụ nữ có giá trung bình đắt hơn 7% so với nam giới)

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.New surveys suggest that the technological tools we use to make our lives easier are killing our leisure time. We are working longer hours, taking fewer and shorter vacations (and when we do go away, we take our cell phones, PDAs, and laptops along). And, we are more stressed than ever as increased use of e-mail, voice mail, cell phones, and the Internet is...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.

New surveys suggest that the technological tools we use to make our lives easier are killing our leisure time. We are working longer hours, taking fewer and shorter vacations (and when we do go away, we take our cell phones, PDAs, and laptops along). And, we are more stressed than ever as increased use of e-mail, voice mail, cell phones, and the Internet is destroying any idea of privacy and leisure.

          Since the Industrial Revolution, people have assumed that new labor-saving devices would free them from the burdens of the workplace and give them more time to grow intellectually, creatively, and socially exploring the arts, keeping up with current events, spending more time with friends and family, and even just 'goofing off'.

          But here we are at the start of the 21st century, enjoying one of the greatest technological boom times in human history, and nothing could be further from the truth. The very tools that were supposed to liberate us have bound us to our work and study in ways that were inconceivable just a few years ago. It would seem that technology almost never does what we expect.

          In 'the old days', the lines between work and leisure time were markedly clearer. People left their offices at a predictable time, were often completely disconnected from and out of touch with their jobs as they traveled to and from work, and were off-duty once they were home. That is no longer true. In today's highly competitive job market, employers demand increased productivity, expecting workers to put in longer hours and to keep in touch almost constantly via fax, cell phones, e-mail, or other communications devices. As a result, employees feel the need to check in on what is going on at the office, even on days off. They feel pressured to work after hours just to catch up on everything they have to do. Workers work harder and longer, change their work tasks more frequently, and have more and more reasons to worry about job security.

          Bosses, colleagues, family members, lovers, and friends expect instant responses to voice mail and e-mail messages. Even college students have become bound to their desks by an environment in which faculty, friends, and other members of the college community increasingly do their work online. Studies of time spent on instant messaging services would probably show staggering use.

          This is not what technology was supposed to be doing for us. New technologies, from genetic research to the Internet, offer all sorts of benefits and opportunities. But, when new tools make life more difficult and stressful rather than easier and more meaningful - and we are, as a society, barely conscious of it - then something has gone seriously awry, both with our expectations for technology and our understanding of how it should benefit us.

From “Summit 1” by Joan Saslow & Allen Ascher

Which of the following is NOT true about technological tools, according to new surveys?

A. They are being increasingly used   

B. They are used even during vacations.

C. They bring more leisure to our life

D. They make our life more stressful.

1
31 tháng 5 2019

Đáp án : C

Dòng đầu: New surveys suggest that the technological tools we use to make our lives easier are killing our leisure time. -> các phương tiện công nghệ giết chết khoảng thời gian rảnh rỗi của chúng ta, chứ không phải mang lại sự rảnh rỗi