Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
I do not agree on computer learning. Although learning on computers, although helping learners to be more flexible in the fields of technology and creativity, there are still many negative aspects, not meeting the learning needs of students:
First, the quality of learning via the Internet cannot be compared with the traditional way of learning - which creates better interaction between students and teachers, managed, questioned, evaluated.
Second, online training can cause social isolation, because school is not only a place to learn but also a place where they come to socialize, make new friends and learn more communication experiences.
Third, this form creates an unevenness among localities. For children who have full learning equipment, have a sense of self-study and good family management, it works. Those children with difficult and unmanaged conditions will learn to cope.
While the benefits of learning online are obvious, it's important to remember that not all courses can be taught online. Therefore, online training should be seen as a complementary and extensible approach to classical forms of learning.
I half agree with this opinion. Why?
Schools have considered the second house where the children can study, play and join the extracurricular activities. In the school, the student can learn all the subject to expand their knowledge, do the exams... and specially, they can play with their friends. But sometime, study too much make they feel stress, yeah, I know this
Study on Internet has some advantages: they can learn by the photos, stories, songs... and they can stop when they want. But, it has many disadvantage. The children are too young to choose the information on Internet, which need to know or needn't. The Internet has many temptation like: games, cartoons... make they can't forcus on study if their parents won't monitoring them, use to much or to long time the electronic device can make their eyes have many problems.
With many reasons, the Internet just help 40 percents the children on study. I think schools have many advantage than study on Internet
There are complaints that bad news overwhelms our television. Some people think that television news should be a mixture of good and bad news. I absolutely support the idea.
First of all, it is understandable that the majority of television news being reported is bad news, such as: wars, famines, accidents and crime. There is a saying: Joy is easy to forget and sadness is easy to remember. The bad news often disturbs us and makes us curious. The more views from the audience, the more profitable the media organizations are.
However, in terms of psychological and medical concerns, if people are frequently exposed to bad news, they will also be affected mentally, gradually they become over-anxious and suspicious. A more dangerous thing is a lack of faith in life. If so, it is getting more and more difficult for us to see good things than to see bad things.
While it is true that most of our media used to be bad news, it is undeniable that the attractiveness of many significant news programs like Loving Leaves (Cặp lá yêu thương - a volunteer program on VTV); news about anti-epidemic doctors who work day and night to protect societal health; ...
Sum up, I believe that in order to have a rich and meaningful life, we need to have a multi-dimensional perspective. Good news and bad news are both pieces of life and need to be harmonized in the media to bring an authentic, objective and appropriate view to audience.
It is thought by some people that there should be a mixture of good and bad news on television. Personally, I completely agree with this view.
The majority of television news being reported is bad news: wars, famines, accidents, and crime. It is obvious that bad news, by its nature, is appealing to people. Their attention can be achieved by broadcasting negative news. People want to know more about wars and criminal behaviors as opposed to peace and good deeds in their community.
However, it is undeniable that bad news have negative impact on people's lives. If the media publishes too much bad news, people will be left feeling hopeless and anxious. They can be stressed and under pressure after reading such type of news.
Thus, the news should report the good happening in the world alongside the bad. Good news such as stories about someone’s achievements, successful personalities, and positive contributions can encourage others to work hard. Some programs about building shelters for the homeless, donating clothes for the poor and so on, these should be shown on TV as well.
In brief, if the media establishes the balance between both types of news, the society will be harmonious and peaceful. This will prevent anxiety and insecurity among the viewers.
Some people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside; other people think that it’s better their children to grow up in a big city. Both possibilities have some advantages and disadvantages. I’ll give advantages of each approach and I’ll argue in favor of this that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside.
In a society where money, career and convenience are important things, many people prefer to live in big cities. Consequently their children grow up there. In the following passage I’ll state some important aspects of the life in the big cities. People go to live there at many reasons. First, a big city provides many opportunities for career and education. For instance, If I live in South Dakota I’ll have chance to live in connection with nature but there are few universities and work positions. However if I live in New York I’ll have opportunity to choose between hundreds of universities and thousands free work positions. This connection If our children grow up in a big city, they will have chance to study in prestige school. Besides, they will be prepared for the life with strong competition.
However we know that the life in a big city has some disadvantages. For instance, stress is problem number one in a big city. That is why many people think that it’s better for their children to grow up in the countryside. The life there has many advantages. First, children, which grow up in the countryside, have chance to live with connection with nature. In most cases there are more calmly and they seldom suffer from psychical diseases in contrast with children which grow in a big city. The life in the countryside is not so dynamic than life in the big city. In the countryside there are few changes. For example, children often spend their childhood in one house, they study in one school, and their parents rarely change their work positions, which reflect negative on the children. To sum up, the life in the countryside is related to few problems than this in a big city.
In conclusion, I think that it’s better for children to grow up in the countryside. That is why, the first thing that we must save is health of our children.
