I agree ............. you your about that .
Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Tk:
The learning process is no longer limited to textbooks, classrooms, and libraries. Technology has greatly changed the way we get information. Students can now access more information, get it more quickly, and get it more conveniently.
An amazing amount of information is available through the internet. We can search for information related to almost any field and get information. We can search about past events and current affairs using the internet. Students can read newspapers or thesis reports published in another part of the world on their computer monitor.
When you use the internet, you don’t have to go through catalogs in the library and spend time searching for books on the bookshelves, the information comes instantly. You just have to type few words and the search engine searches entire World Wide Web databases ad shows you the related information within a few seconds. By using the internet, you can get information more rapidly than by using other media, like newspapers, for example.
It is certainly convenient to search the internet than going to a library and reading books. On the internet, you can search anything, anytime, and anywhere. Unlike books and libraries, you can surf the internet to search for specific information when you are sitting at your home, or when you are eating your breakfast, or when you are at school, or when you are traveling. The Internet allows you to discuss your ideas in “online discussion forums”, and read news and e-books, and watch video tutorials. What could be more convenient?
Technology like audio or video players, TVs, etc has greatly changed the way of learning these days. However, especially the internet has changed the quantity, the speed and the convenience of getting information.
I agree that the more we travel,the more we know. I agree that idea because
Firstly,when we travel,we can learn many things about: history,structure,language,geography,... and we can come to many new,many strange land we haven't gone or come there yet.These are real experience that no book can teach us. The more,it make us feel richer and your ''bank'' of knowledge more,more and more,etc.Augustine also said that: ' The world is a book,who don't go so they can just read a page of this book'.
Secondly,When you come to a new land,you can speak,talk to local people,they can help us very much about history,culture,etc and when we communicate with them,you can be more sociable with many people around us.And traveling is the fastest way to learn foreign language and we are more attractive.
Thirdly,traveling make you more intelligent,more sociable and your confidence level will be increased.
Fourth,traveling make us have more friends,on the way,you can talk with many people,they can be the tourists from the far country,we don't need to know who are they,where are they from,...
Fifth,traveling give us health,make us stronger,it give us the awareness of preparing luggage,buying tickets,finding accomodation,renting cars or a different means of transport.
Sixth,it make our family happier,nealier,and throw away the sadness,boredness, give us smile.Special,it help us understand more about ourselves.We can solve many problem,etc.
This is my idea and different one can have same thought with me or different.But conclusion,traveling have many advantages,so we can have some travel or visits to place,land,sea,island,....
1 Do you think that yarn bombing is art, or vandalism and littering? Why?
(Bạn nghĩ rằng đan len là nghệ thuật, hay phá hoại và xả rác? Tại sao?)
In my opinion, yarn bombing can be considered a form of art because it is a creative and temporary way to decorate public spaces. As I see it, yarn bombing can also be seen as vandalism and littering because it involves covering public objects in a way that may not be permitted.
(Theo tôi, đan len có thể được coi là một loại hình nghệ thuật bởi vì nó là một cách sáng tạo và tạm thời để trang trí không gian công cộng. Theo tôi thấy, đan len cũng có thể được coi là hành vi phá hoại và xả rác vì nó liên quan đến việc che đậy các vật thể công cộng theo cách không được phép.)
2 What about other forms of street art, such as graffiti and chalk drawings on the pavement? Are they art or vandalism? Give reasons for your opinion.
(Còn các hình thức nghệ thuật đường phố khác, chẳng hạn như graffiti và phấn vẽ trên vỉa hè thì sao? Họ là nghệ thuật hay phá hoại? Đưa ra lý do cho ý kiến của bạn.)
I agree that graffiti and chalk drawings on the pavement can be seen as forms of art, especially if they are done with skill and creativity.
However, I see your point that graffiti and chalk drawings can also be seen as vandalism and defacing public property, especially if they are done without permission or in an inappropriate location.
That may be true, but it's also important to consider the message behind the street art. Some graffiti and chalk drawings can be positively political or social commentary, which adds to their artistic value.
(Tôi đồng ý rằng những bức vẽ graffiti và vẽ bằng phấn trên vỉa hè có thể được coi là những hình thức nghệ thuật, đặc biệt nếu chúng được thực hiện với kỹ năng và sự sáng tạo.
Tuy nhiên, tôi thấy quan điểm của bạn rằng các bức vẽ graffiti và vẽ bằng phấn cũng có thể bị coi là hành vi phá hoại và làm xấu tài sản công, đặc biệt nếu chúng được thực hiện mà không được phép hoặc ở một địa điểm không phù hợp.
Điều đó có thể đúng, nhưng điều quan trọng là phải xem xét thông điệp đằng sau nghệ thuật đường phố. Một số bức vẽ graffiti và phấn có thể là bình luận tích cực về chính trị hoặc xã hội, điều này làm tăng thêm giá trị nghệ thuật của chúng.)
People say that students don't need to wear uniforms at school. In my opinion, i strongly disagree with it because of some following reasons.
Firstly, Wearing uniforms encourages student to be proud of being a student of their school because they are wearing the uniforms with the labels bearing their school's name.
Sencondly, Wearing uniforms at school helps students feel equal in many way because we don't know who are rich or poor if they wear uniforms.
Finally, It is practical , you don't have to think of what to wear every day.
To sum up, it si neccessary for students to wear uniform at school.
A great deal of what you write is intended to convince the reader that you have an important point to make. When you write a letter applying for a job you want to convince the reader that you are the right person for the job. When you write a review of a film you want to convince the reader that you have something important to say about the film, and maybe you recommend it, or, on the other hand, suggest that it is not worth seeing. In an essay on some aspect of American government you want to convince the reader that you can answer the questions that have been posed and that you can throw light on specific aspects of American government. In all these three examples you want to show your reader that you have something sensible and important to say about the topic that is under discussion.You do this by arguing your case. You offer “a line of argument” keeping it within the framework of the chosen topic. For example, your letter of application for a job has a presentation of yourself and your qualifications as its framework. “You” are the topic! It might therefore be relevant to mention your hobbies in your letter. If you are applying for a job in a bookshop it would be sensible to point out that reading is one of your hobbies, if it is. You include this in the line of argument running through the letter, perhaps giving this information after you have listed your education and other formal qualifications. You do not, however, spend a paragraph writing about your brother’s or sister’s hobbies. That would be irrelevant. Information about them falls outside the framework you have constructed.
Similarly, if the topic is American government and the question is “Does the President have too much power?” you do not write about American geography or American sports. You write about the mechanics of political power in the USA, showing step by step whether, in your view, the President does or does not have too much power.
You must, then, avoid irrelevance. Keep a sharp focus on your topic.
Đây chỉ là 1 vài ý cơ bản làm dẫn chứng, bạn tham khảo nhé :
In my opinion, students need to wear uniforms at school. School uniforms provide stability. It seems to be fair that all students get dressed in the same clothes
- Uniforms avoid jokes being made about different clothes. Students get bullied because of what they are wearing, uniforms will stop that
- They will pay more attention in class because they don't have to worry about how they look. Instead, they may spend that time thinking about what they have learnt and what they will study
- If students could be allowed to wear casual clothes, some strangers could kidnap a child or something in the school
- Moreover, the uniforms represent your school. When you are wearing your uniform, it makes you proud of your school
I gree with you about that
sorry ko có từ your mong các bạn thông cảm