Some people think that the use of shopping plastic bags should be banned. Do you agree or disagree with this view? In about 200 words, write an essay to state your viewpoint. Use reasons and examples to support your opinions.
K
Khách
Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
Những câu hỏi liên quan
Q
12 tháng 6
Some argue that students should not use computers as a hobby as it may lead to a sedentary lifestyle and hinder physical activity. Spending excessive time in front of screens can have adverse effects on health, such as eye strain, poor posture, and inactivity, which may contribute to obesity and other related health issues. Furthermore, using computers as a hobby may also lead to reduced social interaction and communication skills, as individuals might prefer virtual interactions over face-to-face conversations. Additionally, excessive screen time can affect sleep patterns and cognitive development. It is essential for students to engage in a variety of activities, including physical exercise, social interactions, and creative pursuits, to maintain a healthy and balanced lifestyle. While using a computer for educational purposes and necessary tasks is beneficial, moderation and balance are key to ensuring a well-rounded development in students.
TN
27 tháng 8 2021
In the modern days, the accomodation affects us very much so choosing a properly place to live is an important thing to do.
Everyone will consider living in the city or in the countryside but if we take a closer look , we will see the advantages and disadvantages of each. For examples, the city may convenient but the countryside is more green and beautiful than the city. If the children who live in city, they may be successful but their health is not. Otherwise, the children who live in the countryside may not approach to high techonology and modern studying methods but their minds aren't under pressure of studying too much. In short, every place has each advantages and disadvantages but I think living in the city will be good for children
6 tháng 1 2020
Decision making is a very difficult task for me, whether it is in my personal or professional life. Some people take their decisions by taking their own time, while others take immediately. I believe that, most of the time, decisions made in hurry are poor decisions. There is a chance of mistakes and it could also create problems, and therefore, I think people should take their decisions after careful thought.
To begin with my first reason for this opinion is decisions made in hurry increases our chances of making mistakes and creates problems. From my own experience, if I have to cook something in hurry, then I always forget to add something in my recipe and that make my recipe taste less. Second, while working out, if I try to exercise in hurry, then I might have to face some physical injury or pain. So, I believe that, everyone should take their decisions by thinking and taking some time, which can save them from problems.
Second, most of the time, decisions made in hurry consider as poor decisions. Many times people could not make right decision in hurry. For example, while playing, if players know that opposite team is doing good, and with this pressure player takes poor decision and loose the match. Second example, while working in office with pressure and time limitations, employees take wrong decisions in hurry, this can have bad effect on their overall performance. So, at such situations, we should be quick, but not in hurry, that helps us to take good decision. Hence, thinking before taking any decisions allow us to take wise decision.
Finally, many times we have to take decisions on the spot. In such situations, we should be sharp, and quick in our thoughts, but not in hurry. Because, decisions made in hurry could be poor; could make mistakes, and create problems. So, it is always better to give a thought before taking any decisions.
22 tháng 8 2017
Bài viết 1:
The view, a year of traveling after teenagers finish high school, has been became more and more popular in the world, especially among developed countries. It's seem to be useful way for young people preparing for future and thinking about their future life.
Experts say that gap year is a chance to whom want to experience a completely independent life for first time, thinking about if necessary to continue their study or it's better to find a suitable job? For this reason traveling is a good solution both answer their question and enjoy their life. Generally speaking traveling make human a mature person, by improving human knowledge about own and the world that surrounded them. All of these help to recognize your favorites better and help to make right decision in the future. Also during a journey tolerance of human goes up and it good enough to accept your life duties best and bear hard situations.
On the other hand some people argue that such journeys covered huge cost. Since gappers pay their travel cost, they might go back home without any money for rest of life. So, they say going such journey basically is wrong. This view is true somehow. For all I think governments should pay part of costs in order to encourage people to do that, also organize these travels to be cheaper due to decrease disadvantages of it. In my view, if it is possible, this way is the big chance for the majority of gappers to know themselves.
Over all, although gap year has some disadvantages like it's expensive costs, it could be a good solution for whom want to feel a independent life if governments try to plan such trips.
Bài viết 2:
Some youngsters consider a gap year the key to enhancing their career prospects, others think it is a worthless pursuit. I believe that pursuing a gap-year can provide worthwhile experiences to juveniles, laying the seeds of a prosperous professional career. Although a gap-year is an exciting opportunity to undertake a self-development project, it is risky at the same time.
On the one hand, youngsters can gain relevant work experiences, key skills; broadening their view of the world. Working during the defer years can increase invaluable knowledge. Furthermore, experiencing other countries can help gain an appreciation and awareness of global issues, putting people in the lead. Such knowledge is paramount to secure a dream job.
On the other hand, it can cost an awful amount of money to organise and realise. To add to the ordeal, one can get bankrupt. One in ten people face financial ordeals from budget mismanagement according to gap-year tour operators, however, that number is negligible.
Finally, in my opinion, hefty expenses should be the least cause for deterring a gap-year. The return on investment is high, bringing positive drastic changes to the personality of the youngster. Travelling to other countries solidifies young adults with soft, and hard skills; moulding character and individuality. Facing and circumventing adversity in an unfamiliar country sets a solid foundation for solving problems in life. Such experience is worth the expense.
In conclusion, there is definitely an edge some young person can attain contrasting to those who consider gap-years an expensive waste of time. However, improper planning can adversely affect personal finances; accurate gap-year budget plans eliminates the risk of debt and bankruptcy.
22 tháng 8 2017
Chào bạn, câu trả lời của bạn rất hay, cho mình hỏi bạn tự làm hay chép, nếu chép cho mình xin link của trang nha
LY
27 tháng 2 2017
Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.
While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.
When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.
In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.
LY
27 tháng 2 2017
All around the world, tourism is losing its glitter, due to the lack of responsibility by the government, tourists and local people. Some people consider taking responsibility in tourism by each individual is essential for the better environment, preserving cultures and improving the economy, whereas others think, this cannot be achieved in reality. In my opinion, tourism responsibility is required for better future of the world and this can be achieved with proper implementation.
People travel to different places but never show any attention or responsibility towards its improvement. To make this world a better place to live in, one should take it as one’s responsibility. First of all, the government should take a step, releasing more funds towards tourism and for providing much security. For instance, we find filthy guest houses, restrooms and no cleaning of surrounding places. People travel to enjoy the beauty of nature, but if they find this kind of dirty places, their enjoyment which lead to a bad memory. Even, local people and tourists who travel should obey the guidelines and policy of tourism for a better world.
However, there are some people who think when it comes to implementation of this; it is like a day dream which cannot come into reality. It is difficult for poor and developing countries to utilise more funds towards tourism. On the other hand, it is difficult to provide security and neatness at tourist spots unless every tourist shows attention as his responsibility. For instance, if there are sign boards which shows ‘please use right direction, danger at left direction’, they use only left and if there are any dustbins with ‘please use me’ , they do not use them at all. Thus it is very difficult to make it into reality.
In conclusion, better tourism can be achieved only if every individual takes the responsibility towards tourism. One should think, how much one is contributing, instead of just arguing and blaming the government. But the government should take the first step in achieving this. With this, not only it increases blissfulness of tourists but also increases economy of the country.
VT
26 tháng 2 2017
Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.
While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.
When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.
In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.
26 tháng 2 2017
Bạn có thể tham khảo bài này ở trang IELTS Mentor nha!
Tham khảo nha:
I strongly agree that the use of plastic shopping bags should be banned. Plastic bags pose a significant threat to the environment due to their non-biodegradable nature. They contribute to pollution in our oceans, harm wildlife, and clog up landfills. Banning plastic bags would be a crucial step towards reducing environmental damage and promoting sustainability.
Firstly, plastic bags take hundreds of years to decompose, leading to a buildup of waste in our environment. This accumulation not only affects the aesthetic appeal of our surroundings but also has serious ecological consequences. Marine animals often mistake plastic bags for food, leading to ingestion and death. By banning plastic bags, we can help mitigate these harmful effects and protect marine life.
Furthermore, banning plastic bags encourages the adoption of reusable alternatives, such as cloth or canvas bags. These alternatives are more durable and can be used multiple times, significantly reducing waste. Additionally, reusable bags can be stylish and customizable, encouraging individuals to make environmentally conscious choices.
Some argue that banning plastic bags may inconvenience consumers or businesses. However, the long-term benefits far outweigh any short-term inconveniences. Many countries and cities have successfully implemented plastic bag bans, demonstrating that viable alternatives exist and that the transition is feasible.
In conclusion, banning plastic shopping bags is a necessary and responsible action to protect our environment. By doing so, we can reduce pollution, conserve resources, and safeguard ecosystems for future generations. It is imperative that we prioritize sustainability and take proactive measures to address the pressing issue of plastic pollution.