K
Khách

Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.

21 tháng 10 2023

Chọn Đáp án D

in favour of sth: ủng hộ cái gì 

1 tháng 1 2019

Kiến thức kiểm tra: Sự hòa hợp giữa chủ ngữ và động từ

“Whether” đứng đầu câu => dấu hiệu nhận biết của mệnh đề danh từ, đứng đầu câu làm chủ ngữ

Công thức:

Whether + S + V + V (chia theo ngôi thứ 3 số ít)

chủ ngữ (không đếm được)

động từ chính của câu

Sửa: depend on => depends on

Tạm dịch: Liệu cuộc sống ở nông thôn tốt hơn cuộc sống ở thành phố hay không phụ thuộc vào quan điểm của mỗi cá nhân.

Chọn C

5 tháng 1 2020

Kiến thức: Từ trái nghĩa

Giải thích:

impertiment (adj): xấc xược

A. inadequate (adj): không đầy đủ                   B. smooth (adj): mịn

C. healthy (adj): khỏe mạnh                             D. respectful (adj): kính trọng

=> impertiment >< respectful

Tạm dịch: Quan điểm của Salish là đúng nhưng cách cư xử của anh ta với cha anh ta khá xấc xược.

Chọn D 

27 tháng 1 2019

Đáp án D

Kiến thức: Từ vựng, từ trái nghĩa

Giải thích:

impertinent (a): xấc láo, hỗn xược

healthy (a): khoẻ mạnh                        smooth (a): trôi chảy, suôn sẻ

inadequate (a): không thỏa đáng                    respectful (a): tôn trọng

=> impertinent >< respectful

Tạm dịch: Quan điểm của Satish là chính xác nhưng thái độ của anh với cha khá xấc láo.

23 tháng 9 2018

Đáp án C

Cấu trúc: to bring SB round: thuyết phục ai đó để có cùng quan điểm với bạn

Tạm dịch: Lúc đầu anh ấy không đồng ý nhưng cuối cùng chúng tôi đã xoay sở để thuyết phục anh ấy theo quan điểm của chúng tôi

26 tháng 6 2017

Đáp án là D. However : tuy nhiên ( liên từ chỉ sự nhượng bộ)

Hai vế chỉ sự tương phản: Tôi hiểu quan điểm của bạn. Tuy nhiên, tôi không đồng tình với bạn.

16 tháng 2 2017

Đáp án C

Bring sb round (to sth): làm cho thay đổi ý kiến theo

Bring up:đem lên, mang lên; nuôi nấng, giáo dục, dạy dỗ; ngừng lại, đỗ lại, thả neo; lưu ý về, đề cập đến; làm cho (ai) phải đứng lên phát biểu đưa ra tòa

Bring over: làm cho ai thay đổi lối suy nghĩ, thuyết phục; đưa ai đến chơi Bring back: mang trả lại; gợi lại

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions Because geologists have long indicated that fossil fuels will not last indefinitely, the U.S government finally acknowledged that sooner or later other energy sources would be needed and, as a result, turned its attention to nuclear power. It was anticipated that nuclear power plants could supply electricity in such large amounts and so inexpensively that they...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions

Because geologists have long indicated that fossil fuels will not last indefinitely, the U.S government finally acknowledged that sooner or later other energy sources would be needed and, as a result, turned its attention to nuclear power. It was anticipated that nuclear power plants could supply electricity in such large amounts and so inexpensively that they would be integrated into an economy in which electricity would take over virtually all fuel-generating functions at nominal cost. Thus, the government subsidized the promotion of commercial nuclear power plants and authorized their construction by utility companies. In the 1960s and early 1970s, the public accepted the notion of electricity being generated by nuclear power plants in or near residential areas. By 1975, 54 plants were fully operational, supplying 11 percent of the nation’s electricity, and another 167 plants were at various stages of planning and construction. Officials estimated that by 1990 hundreds of plants would be on line, and by the turn of the century as many as 1000 plants would be in working order.

Since 1975, this outlook and this estimation have changed drastically, and many utilizes have cancelled existing orders. In some cases, construction was terminated even after billions of dollars had already been invested. After being completed and licensed at a cost of almost $6 billion, the Shoreham Power Plant on Long Island was turned over to the state of New York to be dismantled without ever having generated electric power. The reason was that residents and state authorities deemed that there was no possibility of evacuating residents from the area should an accident occur.

Just 68 of those plants under way in 1975 have been completed, and another 3 are still under construction. Therefore, it appears that in the mid1990s 124 nuclear power plants in the nation will be in operation, generating about 18 percent of the nation’s electricity, a figure that will undoubtedly decline as relatively outdated plants are shut down

How does the author describe the attitude of the population in regard to nuclear power as fuel in the early to the mid 1970s?

A. Apprehensive

B. Ambivalent

C. Receptive

D. Resentful

1
8 tháng 2 2017

Đáp án C

Tác giả miêu tả thái độ của dân số liên quan đến điện hạt nhân như là nhiên liệu vào đầu đến giữa năm 1970?

Đán án C – Receptive (a) tiếp thu, lĩnh hội

Dẫn chứng – Câu 4 – Đoạn 1: In the 1960s and early 1970s, the public accepted the notion of electricity being generated by nuclear power plants in or near residential areas.

Tạm dịch: Trong những năm 1960 và đầu những năm 70, công chúng đã chấp nhận khái niệm điện được tạo ra bởi các nhà máy điện hạt nhân tạo trong hoặc gần các khu dân cư.

Các đáp án khác

A – sợ hãi, e sợ

B – hai chiều

D – không bằng lòng

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 30 to 34. The Great Energy Debate Modern civilization is heavily dependent on energy. Without reliable power sources, e coulnt operate machines, use transportation, communicate via Internet, or do many other things. Although everyone recognizes the importance of energy, deciding what kind of energy the world should use in the future is not a simple...
Đọc tiếp

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions from 30 to 34.

The Great Energy Debate

Modern civilization is heavily dependent on energy. Without reliable power sources, e coulnt operate machines, use transportation, communicate via Internet, or do many other things. Although everyone recognizes the importance of energy, deciding what kind of energy the world should use in the future is not a simple task. The two leading candidates for this role are green energy and nuclear energy.

Currently, most of the energy we use is derived from fossil fuels. Although this energy source has got us this far, there are several problems with it. For starters, it is a finite resource which is quickly running out. Some analysts have even estimated that the Earth could run out of coal and oil within the next 50 years. Burning fossil fuels also creates large amount of pollution, which is harmful to the environment. Although fossil fuels still provide the majority of our power, governments are seeking better energy sources to use going forward.

Green energy is one option that is becoming increasingly attractive. It includes technologies such as solar, wind, and hydro power. These are seen as clean sources of energy because they cause very little pollution. In addition, they are completely renewable, so there is no danger that it will run out. The major disadvantage with green energy sources is that they are not cheap.

The other alternative is nuclear power. Like green energy, it is also a renewable source of power that will not run out, and it also doesn’t produce air pollution. In addition, nuclear power is more reliable than green energy, as it doesn’t depend on sunshine, rain, or wind to operate. The major issues with nuclear power are safety concerns and nuclear waste. Nuclear power plants create a considerable amount of nuclear waste which is extremely hazardous to people’s health. I they happen to have a meltdown, this could destroy the surrounding area for years to come.

The recent nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan brought this reality into the spotlight once again. In response, Germany announced it would close down eight of its nuclear plants immediately, and close the rest by 2022. Meanwhile, other nations refuse to give up on nuclear power, stating that these disasters are rare. The debate of whether to use green or nuclear power will likely continue for some time. In the end, it is quite possible that both energy sources will be used to fuel our planet.

The work “spotlight” in paragraph 5 is closest in meaning to __________.

A. concern

B. attention

C. danger

D. area of light

1
19 tháng 8 2018

Chọn B.

Đáp án B.

Ta có: spotlight (vị trí nổi bật) = attention (sự chú ý)

Các đáp án khác không phù hợp.

A. concern: quan tâm

C. danger: nguy hiểm

D. area of light: vùng ánh sáng