Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?"Disruptive students have a negative influence on others.Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separatedly".Write an essay (from 200 to 250 words) to support your opnion.
Hãy nhập câu hỏi của bạn vào đây, nếu là tài khoản VIP, bạn sẽ được ưu tiên trả lời.
I agree that life skills should be taught to young people at school along with traditional subjects like math and science.
First of all, we need to know what life skills are? Life skills are actions derived from things that people have been learned to respond effectively to situations or interact appropriately with those around them. So it is a very essential thing for life. For example, if we are injured, the life skill is to help us know how to bandage the wound or when there is a fire or an earthquake, it helps us to know how to escape. If we don't learn life skills, then we will have rude behavior in public places, from not knowing how to give room to the elderly to jostling each other when shopping, etc. Survival skills are the attitudes that manifest every day in life, it will be very difficult if we do not apply it on a regular basis to become good habits. But on the contrary, if we care and express ourselves in every situation, from greetings, dear ... to learning how to organize learning, playing and doing a good thing every day then everything will become simple, natural.
First of all, you should appreciate yourself, know how to equip yourself with skills to protect yourself. Then know how to respect the rules of society and take care of others. Just every day you do a good thing and do a good deed, even though simple and small, you will gradually equip yourself with skills in a safe and happy life!
We all know that life skills are very important, and my parents usually say that they are even more important than traditional subjects, such as maths, science, ... And in real life, there are many opinions about what things are more necessary. Therefore, I highly agree with this statement. And here are some reasons.
Firstly, life skills are really vital for all children, even after they graduate. Here are some of my definitions of life skills. From my point of view, any skill that is useful for one's life, such as tidying the room, cleaning the house, using a computer, etc..., can be a life skill. So, life skills are very important for each person's life. And if children study about life skills, after graduating school, they can be self-confident and they will successfully deal with every changes and challenges.
Secondly, with life skills, children can determine their life. As I have noted, small but necessary skills can be life skills, so if children don't know any skills or they can only do simple things, their living capital can be limited, so they must always have someone to help them. I think this is not really reasonable, because it means that children always depend on someone, and their lives will be very mechanical - they can't do what they want themselves.
In short, although traditional subjects provide children a large amount of knowledge, life skills must be taught together with those subjects. So, totally agree with the statement!
Decision making is a very difficult task for me, whether it is in my personal or professional life. Some people take their decisions by taking their own time, while others take immediately. I believe that, most of the time, decisions made in hurry are poor decisions. There is a chance of mistakes and it could also create problems, and therefore, I think people should take their decisions after careful thought.
To begin with my first reason for this opinion is decisions made in hurry increases our chances of making mistakes and creates problems. From my own experience, if I have to cook something in hurry, then I always forget to add something in my recipe and that make my recipe taste less. Second, while working out, if I try to exercise in hurry, then I might have to face some physical injury or pain. So, I believe that, everyone should take their decisions by thinking and taking some time, which can save them from problems.
Second, most of the time, decisions made in hurry consider as poor decisions. Many times people could not make right decision in hurry. For example, while playing, if players know that opposite team is doing good, and with this pressure player takes poor decision and loose the match. Second example, while working in office with pressure and time limitations, employees take wrong decisions in hurry, this can have bad effect on their overall performance. So, at such situations, we should be quick, but not in hurry, that helps us to take good decision. Hence, thinking before taking any decisions allow us to take wise decision.
Finally, many times we have to take decisions on the spot. In such situations, we should be sharp, and quick in our thoughts, but not in hurry. Because, decisions made in hurry could be poor; could make mistakes, and create problems. So, it is always better to give a thought before taking any decisions.
Refer:
There has been a lot of argument about whether students should be allowed to bring their mobile phones to school. In my opinion, students should not be allowed to bring their mobile phones to school. Let me explain why it is reasonable not to allow students to bring their phones to school.
First of all, I think mobile phones will sidetrack the learning of students. If they use their mobile phones for playing or just for learning purpose, they may not pay enough attention in class because they just concentrate on playing with their mobile phones. So, the academic results of the students will drop due to the use of the mobile phones during the class. Moreover, the learning process of the students may be hindered too.
Secondly, bringing their own mobile phones is not necessary because of the public phones in school. Public phones are provided by the school. So, students can use phones near the school gate or tuck shop. And there are three public phones, which are enough for students to contact their parents. They need not bring their phones to school if their reason is contacting their parents.
What is more, there are enough resources for learning in school already. As a result, students don’t have the need to bring their phones to school. Because of the rapid development of technologies nowadays, computers are invented. So they can use computers for learning. Moreover, computers mostly have the programmes or function which mobile phones share the same too. Therefore,it is not a must or a need for students to bring their phones to school.
However, some students said that the purpose of bringing mobile phones to school is to contact parents if they face a traffic accident. But in fact, students just use one or two minutes to contact their parents, and they use plenty of time to play games in their mobile phones. This shows the main purpose of bringing mobile phones is not contacting their parents, but to play with their mobile phones on the way back home. Bringing mobile phones in order to contact their parents is just an excuse for them.
To sum up, students bringing their phones to school is just to play with their phones only, but not to contact their parents. Therefore, I think students should not be allowed to bring mobile phones to school.
Today, there are many students who are using, there are private phones for themselves, but there are some of you who not only use them at home but also bring them to school to use, I partially agree and partly disagree. As for the consent, there are people who need to use the phone as a source of information to look up and study online. but I don't mind more. Because most students bring their phones to school to surf the net, take pictures, text messages, and access unhealthy social networking sites. Therefore, even if the phone can be looked up and useful for learning, it should not be brought to school
Online learning has emerged as a convenient and effective alternative to traditional classroom instruction. In this essay, I firmly agree with the statement that online learning not only offers convenience but also proves to be more effective than traditional classroom teaching. Firstly, online learning provides unmatched convenience for both students and teachers. With the click of a button, students can access course materials, lectures, and assignments at any time and from any location. This flexibility allows individuals to tailor their learning experience around their personal schedules, enabling them to balance work, family commitments, and education effectively. Moreover, online platforms eliminate the need for lengthy commutes and provide an inclusive learning environment, as students from various geographic locations can access the same resources and expertise. Secondly, online learning has demonstrated its effectiveness through improved outcomes and engagement. The personalized nature of online courses allows students to progress at their own pace, ensuring a thorough understanding of the subject matter. Adaptive learning tools and assessments help identify areas of weakness and provide targeted interventions, enabling students to strengthen their knowledge gaps. Additionally, online platforms often incorporate interactive multimedia, simulations, and gamification techniques, which enhance student engagement and promote active learning. Furthermore, online learning encourages the development of valuable digital skills that are increasingly vital in today's technology-driven world. Students become proficient in navigating online platforms, utilizing digital resources, and collaborating in virtual environments. These skills are transferable to various professional settings and enhance students' employability prospects. While face-to-face interactions are seen as a strength of traditional classrooms, online learning has adapted by incorporating discussion forums, video conferencing, and group projects. These tools foster meaningful interactions, promote peer learning, and create a sense of community among students. In conclusion, online learning offers unparalleled convenience, personalized learning experiences, and the development of digital skills. Its flexibility and effectiveness make it a superior alternative to traditional classroom instruction. By embracing online learning, we can create a more accessible and efficient education system that meets the diverse needs of students and teachers in the modern world.
Tham khảo
Nowaday, the life is modern. Smart phones and computers are very popular and they appear all around us. Using smart phones is a necessary part of many students' life and students should use smartphone in their studying Students can learn in the Internet, search information for their lessons,... Using smart phones can solve many problems quickly and easily. But, there is a problem.Some students mostly use smart phones to relax and spend less time studying. They concentrate on the smart phones instead of keeping their eye on learning.
If students were allowed to use smart phones, learning would be easier . Unless they were banned to use smart phones, they could be focus on learning. Anyway, I think smart phones shouldn't be banned. Although it makes students can't be focus on the lessons, It helps them a lots in relaxing at break time and studying. We've also got some suitable rules such as: not using phones while you are studying, just use them at break time,...
Nowaday, the life is modern. Smart phones and computers are very popular and they appear all around us. Using smart phones is a necessary part of many students' life and students should use smartphone in their studying Students can learn in the Internet, search information for their lessons,... Using smart phones can solve many problems quickly and easily. But, there is a problem.Some students mostly use smart phones to relax and spend less time studying. They concentrate on the smart phones instead of keeping their eye on learning.
If students were allowed to use smart phones, learning would be easier . Unless they were banned to use smart phones, they could be focus on learning. Anyway, I think smart phones shouldn't be banned. Although it makes students can't be focus on the lessons, It helps them a lots in relaxing at break time and studying. We've also got some suitable rules such as: not using phones while you are studying, just use them at break time,...
I do not agree on computer learning. Although learning on computers, although helping learners to be more flexible in the fields of technology and creativity, there are still many negative aspects, not meeting the learning needs of students:
First, the quality of learning via the Internet cannot be compared with the traditional way of learning - which creates better interaction between students and teachers, managed, questioned, evaluated.
Second, online training can cause social isolation, because school is not only a place to learn but also a place where they come to socialize, make new friends and learn more communication experiences.
Third, this form creates an unevenness among localities. For children who have full learning equipment, have a sense of self-study and good family management, it works. Those children with difficult and unmanaged conditions will learn to cope.
While the benefits of learning online are obvious, it's important to remember that not all courses can be taught online. Therefore, online training should be seen as a complementary and extensible approach to classical forms of learning.
I half agree with this opinion. Why?
Schools have considered the second house where the children can study, play and join the extracurricular activities. In the school, the student can learn all the subject to expand their knowledge, do the exams... and specially, they can play with their friends. But sometime, study too much make they feel stress, yeah, I know this
Study on Internet has some advantages: they can learn by the photos, stories, songs... and they can stop when they want. But, it has many disadvantage. The children are too young to choose the information on Internet, which need to know or needn't. The Internet has many temptation like: games, cartoons... make they can't forcus on study if their parents won't monitoring them, use to much or to long time the electronic device can make their eyes have many problems.
With many reasons, the Internet just help 40 percents the children on study. I think schools have many advantage than study on Internet
MÌNH ĐÃ LÀM BÀI NAY TRONG PHẦN THI IELTS CỦA TRUNG TÂM BẠN XEM THAM KHẢO!
Agree with the following statement that parents are the best teachers for children because they try to learn everything from their parents that help them in their future and also helpful in making their personality. Parents seem to be mirror image of their children , who want to be exactly like that image in their lives.
Behaviour is naturally adapted by the young ones by seeing their surrounding ,the kind of behaviour in which they live at their homes and it depends mostly on parents to teach their child to behave properly or improperly such as if parents are unable to keep their house environment disciplined than this environment will be noted by kids and they will learn the same behaviour which lacks some discipline,respect for their entire life.
Parents will have the responsibility to make their children learn responsibility in life , their goals for life,healthy and prosperous way of living,their behaviour with other people,peaceful environment must be present in life. Such things are taught by parents that help us in making our living good and well managed.
Therefore,the role of parents are indefinite and significant in everybody's lives and they are the milestone who give us way to lead our lives with a respectful manner.Parents are the best guide for children's life and they give their children advice and support in any circumstances present in their lives .
Even though these children become adults and are able to understand every situation,make their own decisions.Parents will always with their kids and always guide them like they did before .
CÔ MÌNH CÓ CHO CHÉP MỘT BÀI MẪU ĐỂ THAM KHẢO, BẠN ĐỌC QUA XEM THỬ CÓ HAY KHÔNG? (DISAGREE)
Parents teach a lot to the children and the ground made by them shapes the future of the children. On the other hand, someone learns throughout his life and thus become the person he really is. In this learning process, he himself contributes the most and teachers, friends, nature, books, academic education are important as well. Though parents are very good teachers, in my opinion, they are not the best teacher for someone and the person himself is the best teacher for him.
After we learn to talk, walk and basic morality and intricacies of our life, we start going to school and there we learn new things every day. The book, the teachers, the friends and the environment shapes what we become. Parents teach their kid to a bright, good fellow and yet there are lots of immoral and corrupted people who actually were transformed badly by themselves. So someone himself is the best teacher for him. Besides this the things we learn from our life experiences, teachers and books become far more important that what we learned in our infant time.
Parents do their fine duty to raise a child to become a good adult and later he gets the education and experiences from his life and school play the vital role for his future.
In terms of being our teachers, our experience and nature play an utmost important role. We learn so many things from our surroundings and nature is a silent teacher who widely opens the mystery and significance of our life.
The things we learn from our parents are of course important to our life but they are rather some righteous lessons and good advises. Later in our life, we face the real situations and learn the true lessons from our experience and in terms of learning this is the most important part.
So considering all of the above, I would like to opine that, parents are very important teachers for us but never the best teachers.
BÀI TRƯỚC LÀ ĐỒNG Ý; BÀI NÀY LÀ KHÔNG ĐỒNG Ý. AND YOU?